In mine textbook, it says that the maximum variety of electrons that have the right to fit in any kind of given shell is given by 2n². This would median 2 electrons could fit in the very first shell, 8 could fit in the second shell, 18 in the third shell, and 32 in the 4th shell.

However, i was previously taught the the maximum variety of electrons in the an initial orbital is 2, 8 in the 2nd orbital, 8 in the third shell, 18 in the fourth orbital, 18 in the fifth orbital, 32 in the sixth orbital. Ns am reasonably sure that orbitals and shells are the same thing.

Which of this two approaches is correct and should be used to uncover the number of electrons in one orbital?

I to be in high institution so please shot to leveling your answer and use reasonably basic terms.

You are watching: How many electrons in the 4th shell electrons electronic-configuration
improve this question
edited january 22 "17 in ~ 9:54

Melanie Shebel♦
6,32099 yellow badges4242 silver badges8181 bronze title
inquiry Feb 20 "14 in ~ 4:13

56733 gold badges77 silver- badges1010 bronze badges
add a comment |

3 answers 3

energetic oldest Votes
Shells and also orbitals room not the same. In terms of quantum numbers, electrons in different shells will have various values of major quantum number n.

To answer your question...

In the first shell (n=1), we have:

The 1s orbital

In the 2nd shell (n=2), us have:

The 2s orbitalThe 2p orbitals

In the third shell (n=3), us have:

The 3s orbitalThe 3p orbitalsThe 3d orbitals

In the fourth shell (n=4), we have:

The 4s orbitalThe 4p orbitalsThe 4d orbitalsThe 4f orbitals

So one more kind the orbitals (s, p, d, f) becomes obtainable as we go to a shell with higher n. The number in prior of the letter signifies which shell the orbital(s) room in. For this reason the 7s orbital will be in the 7th shell.

Now for the different kinds of orbitalsEach sort of orbital has actually a different "shape", as you deserve to see ~ above the snapshot below. You can also see that:

The s-kind has actually only one orbitalThe p-kind has three orbitalsThe d-kind has five orbitalsThe f-kind has actually seven orbitals


Each orbital have the right to hold two electrons. One spin-up and one spin-down. This means that the 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, etc., can each hold two electrons since they each have only one orbital.

The 2p, 3p, 4p, etc., can each host six electrons because they each have three orbitals, that deserve to hold two electrons every (3*2=6).

The 3d, 4d etc., have the right to each organize ten electrons, due to the fact that they each have five orbitals, and each orbital have the right to hold two electrons (5*2=10).

Thus, to find the variety of electrons feasible per shell

First, we look in ~ the n=1 shell (the very first shell). The has:

The 1s orbital

An s-orbital hold 2 electrons. Therefore n=1 shell have the right to hold 2 electrons.

The n=2 (second) shell has:

The 2s orbitalThe 2p orbitals

s-orbitals have the right to hold 2 electrons, the p-orbitals have the right to hold 6 electrons. Thus, the second shell have the right to have 8 electrons.

The n=3 (third) covering has:

The 3s orbitalThe 3p orbitalsThe 3d orbitals

s-orbitals have the right to hold 2 electrons, p-orbitals can hold 6, and also d-orbitals deserve to hold 10, for a total of 18 electrons.

Therefore, the formula $2n^2$ holds! What is the difference between your two methods?

There"s an important distinction in between "the variety of electrons feasible in a shell" and also "the number of valence electrons possible for a period of elements".

See more: 120 Kg In Stones And Pounds, Kilograms To Stones And Pounds Converter

There"s an are for $18 exte^-$ in the third shell: $3s + 3p + 3d = 2 + 6 + 10 = 18$, however, aspects in the 3rd period only have actually up to 8 valence electrons. This is due to the fact that the $3d$-orbitals aren"t filled till we gain to elements from the 4th period - ie. Facets from the third period don"t fill the 3rd shell.

The orbitals room filled so that the persons of lowest power are fill first. The power is roughly like this: