These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the starrkingschool.net starrkingschool.net editors or of starrkingschool.net University Press or its licensors.


You are watching: Use judicial review in a sentence

My second example concerns the common practice of coupling such constitutional provisions with judicial review.
Students of judicial history must remember that judicial review had to be established both legally and politically.
Parliament is, in their view, the supreme lawmaking body and therefore its internal rules are not subject to judicial review.
Despite the general recognition that some form of judicial review is desirable, if not necessary, for the functioning of democratic regimes, the practice remains controversial.
What follows is an argument in favour of a bill of rights that is subject to legislative and judicial review.
In the former the court decided that manufacturing was not commerce, thus excluding a large sector of the economy from judicial review.
It also implies that the differentiation between judicial review and judicial control may and, in the present case, has diminished.
The separation of powers and judicial review are two mechanisms to ensure government responsibility.
Along the same lines, the purpose of judicial review is to ensure that legislative and executive action conforms to law.
The extinction of state autonomy and the pre-emption of independent judicial review effectively precluded the development of judicial federalism under military rule.
If anything, the importance of dialogic judicial review is more apparent in statutory bills of rights.
And yet, as will be shown, it is not a straightforward task to interpret judicial review in principal-agent terminology.
Unlike the weak notice-and-comment provision, the adjudication and appeals/judicial review procedures appear, on paper, to be more detailed, and hence more potent.
Reformers had no fear of presidential veto, no need to compromise with a second chamber, no worry about judicial review.
All three systems envisage, to varying degrees, executive-based rights review before legislation is introduced, followed by legislative rights review, and then judicial review.
Judicial independence is deemed necessary in order to achieve due process and impartiality in the tasks of adjudication and judicial review.
Legislators who enact an unconstitutional law, for example, would be rebuffed by a court through the exercise of judicial review.
The argument in this article is that legislative review should supplement, but not necessarily replace, judicial review.
To the extent that liberal constitutionalists recognize these difficulties they look to processes of judicial review to resolve them.
We discuss here three major factors influencing the structure of judicial review : constitutional arrangements, the scope of juridical power and the rules governing standing.
*

*

*

*



See more: Used 2005 Ford Freestyle Gas Tank Size, 2005 Ford Freestyle

*