Since there deserve to be <-ℓ, ℓ> orientations and since the orbital kind f has actually ℓ = 3, we should have actually 7 possible orientations v 2 spins, for this reason $7 imes 2 = 14$, for this reason I believed the correct answer was D (14).

You are watching: What is the maximum number of f orbitals that are possible in a given shell?

However, I obtained it wrong and the correct answer is significant as C (2). Is it an error in the test, or am I absent something?

You"re correct the there space seven possible spatial orientations because that an f-type orbital, and hence seven possible orbitals in one f-type sub-shell. However, the question specifically asks for the maximum number of electrons in one together orbital, and also any solitary atomic orbital, nevertheless of the sub-shell type specified by $l$, have the right to only hold two electrons. This is through virtue the the Pauli exclusion principle. Fourteen would be the maximum number of electrons across an entire f-type sub-shell, yet the question just asks around one orbital.

The question specifically ask the no.of electron an orbit of f subshell deserve to hold.... Together we understand that f subshell contain 7 orbital and each orbital can hold maximum 2 electons so correct answer would be 2..we can simply know this by acquisition the actual life instance imagine the there is home named f which consists of 7 rooms so likewise in this situation house is a subshell and each room is one orbital... Say thanks to you,

Thanks because that contributing solution to starrkingschool.net stack Exchange!

But avoid

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to various other answers.Making statements based upon opinion; back them up with referrals or personal experience.

Use MathJax to style equations. MathJax reference.

See more: Jonathan Kozol The Human Cost Of An Illiterate Society, “The Human Cost Of An Illiterate Society”